From 8a9204596af763d618ec6e67a5289b4799e1a1e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Bennetts <steve@lindenlab.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:08:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Partial fix for EXT-1123 (this shouldn't merit a
notification), but we should investigate why these requests are failing in
the first place.
---
indra/newview/lllandmarklist.cpp | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/indra/newview/lllandmarklist.cpp b/indra/newview/lllandmarklist.cpp
index 318344f9eff..8e331fa71d2 100644
--- a/indra/newview/lllandmarklist.cpp
+++ b/indra/newview/lllandmarklist.cpp
@@ -128,14 +128,16 @@ void LLLandmarkList::processGetAssetReply(
else
{
LLViewerStats::getInstance()->incStat( LLViewerStats::ST_DOWNLOAD_FAILED );
-
+ // SJB: No use case for a notification here. Use lldebugs instead
if( LL_ERR_ASSET_REQUEST_NOT_IN_DATABASE == status )
{
- LLNotifications::instance().add("LandmarkMissing");
+ LL_DEBUGS("Landmarks") << "Missing Landmark" << LL_ENDL;
+ //LLNotifications::instance().add("LandmarkMissing");
}
else
{
- LLNotifications::instance().add("UnableToLoadLandmark");
+ LL_DEBUGS("Landmarks") << "Unable to load Landmark" << LL_ENDL;
+ //LLNotifications::instance().add("UnableToLoadLandmark");
}
gLandmarkList.mBadList.insert(uuid);
--
GitLab