Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Nov 11, 2020
  2. Oct 12, 2020
  3. Oct 09, 2020
  4. Sep 29, 2020
  5. Sep 26, 2020
  6. Sep 25, 2020
  7. Aug 26, 2020
  8. Aug 20, 2020
  9. Aug 06, 2020
  10. Aug 05, 2020
  11. Jul 30, 2020
  12. Jul 10, 2020
  13. Jun 23, 2020
  14. Jun 16, 2020
  15. Jun 15, 2020
  16. May 29, 2020
  17. May 18, 2020
  18. May 15, 2020
  19. May 14, 2020
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      DRTVWR-476, SL-12204: Fix crash in Marketplace Listings. · 9d5d257c
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      The observed crash was due to sharing a stateful global resource (the global
      LLMessageSystem instance) between different tasks. Specifically, a coroutine
      sets its mMessageReader one way, expecting that value to persist until it's
      done with message parsing, but another coroutine sneaks in at a suspension
      point and sets it differently.
      
      Introduce LockMessageReader and LockMessageChecker classes, which must be
      instantiated by a consumer of the resource. The constructor of each locks a
      coroutine-aware mutex, so that for the lifetime of the lock object no other
      coroutine can instantiate another.
      
      Refactor the code so that LLMessageSystem::mMessageReader can only be modified
      by LockMessageReader, not by direct assignment. mMessageReader is now an
      instance of LLMessageReaderPointer, which supports dereferencing and
      comparison but not assignment. Only LockMessageReader can change its value.
      
      LockMessageReader addresses the use case in which the specific mMessageReader
      value need only persist for the duration of a single method call. Add an
      instance in LLMessageHandlerBridge::post().
      
      LockMessageChecker is a subclass of LockMessageReader: both lock the same
      mutex. LockMessageChecker addresses the use case in which the specific
      mMessageReader value must persist across multiple method calls. Modify the
      methods in question to require a LockMessageChecker instance. Provide
      LockMessageChecker forwarding methods to facilitate calling the underlying
      LLMessageSystem methods via the LockMessageChecker instance.
      
      Add LockMessageChecker instances to LLAppViewer::idleNetwork(), a couple cases
      in idle_startup() and LLMessageSystem::establishBidirectionalTrust().
      9d5d257c
    • Andrey Kleshchev's avatar
      Revert SL-8191 due to it no longer being valid · 9c445f6e
      Andrey Kleshchev authored
      This reverts commit 4c006e76.
      Since EEP there are no 'basic shaders' and doing this in llfloatersettingsdebug was wrong either way
      9c445f6e
    • Andrey Lihatskiy's avatar
      Merged in SL-12090 (pull request #105) · ebc629ff
      Andrey Lihatskiy authored
      SL-12090 Initialize the joystick only when required
      
      * SL-12090 Initialize the joystick only when required
      
      Approved-by: Andrey Kleshchev
      ebc629ff
  20. May 13, 2020
  21. May 07, 2020
  22. May 04, 2020
  23. May 03, 2020
  24. Apr 28, 2020
  25. Apr 20, 2020
  26. Mar 26, 2020
  27. Mar 25, 2020
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      DRTVWR-476: Mention LLApp::stepFrame() in LLAppViewer::idle() · 253e3600
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      which performs "by hand" the same sequence of calls found in stepFrame().
      
      Why not simply call stepFrame()? Hysterical reasons?
      253e3600
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      SL-793: Use Boost.Fiber instead of the "dcoroutine" library. · 66981fab
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      Longtime fans will remember that the "dcoroutine" library is a Google Summer
      of Code project by Giovanni P. Deretta. He originally called it
      "Boost.Coroutine," and we originally added it to our 3p-boost autobuild
      package as such. But when the official Boost.Coroutine library came along
      (with a very different API), and we still needed the API of the GSoC project,
      we renamed the unofficial one "dcoroutine" to allow coexistence.
      
      The "dcoroutine" library had an internal low-level API more or less analogous
      to Boost.Context. We later introduced an implementation of that internal API
      based on Boost.Context, a step towards eliminating the GSoC code in favor of
      official, supported Boost code.
      
      However, recent versions of Boost.Context no longer support the API on which
      we built the shim for "dcoroutine." We started down the path of reimplementing
      that shim using the current Boost.Context API -- then realized that it's time
      to bite the bullet and replace the "dcoroutine" API with the Boost.Fiber API,
      which we've been itching to do for literally years now.
      
      Naturally, most of the heavy lifting is in llcoros.{h,cpp} and
      lleventcoro.{h,cpp} -- which is good: the LLCoros layer abstracts away most of
      the differences between "dcoroutine" and Boost.Fiber.
      
      The one feature Boost.Fiber does not provide is the ability to forcibly
      terminate some other fiber. Accordingly, disable LLCoros::kill() and
      LLCoprocedureManager::shutdown(). The only known shutdown() call was in
      LLCoprocedurePool's destructor.
      
      We also took the opportunity to remove postAndSuspend2() and its associated
      machinery: FutureListener2, LLErrorEvent, errorException(), errorLog(),
      LLCoroEventPumps. All that dual-LLEventPump stuff was introduced at a time
      when the Responder pattern was king, and we assumed we'd want to listen on one
      LLEventPump with the success handler and on another with the error handler. We
      have never actually used that in practice. Remove associated tests, of course.
      
      There is one other semantic difference that necessitates patching a number of
      tests: with "dcoroutine," fulfilling a future IMMEDIATELY resumes the waiting
      coroutine. With Boost.Fiber, fulfilling a future merely marks the fiber as
      ready to resume next time the scheduler gets around to it. To observe the test
      side effects, we've inserted a number of llcoro::suspend() calls -- also in
      the main loop.
      
      For a long time we retained a single unit test exercising the raw "dcoroutine"
      API. Remove that.
      
      Eliminate llcoro_get_id.{h,cpp}, which provided llcoro::get_id(), which was a
      hack to emulate fiber-local variables. Since Boost.Fiber has an actual API for
      that, remove the hack.
      
      In fact, use (new alias) LLCoros::local_ptr for LLSingleton's dependency
      tracking in place of llcoro::get_id().
      
      In CMake land, replace BOOST_COROUTINE_LIBRARY with BOOST_FIBER_LIBRARY. We
      don't actually use the Boost.Coroutine for anything (though there exist
      plausible use cases).
      66981fab
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      SL-11216: Try to pacify VS 2013. · 8961be78
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      8961be78
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      SL-11216: getViewerInfo() calls LLVersionInfo::getReleaseNotes(). · 15418f99
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      Make LLAppViewer retrieve release notes from LLVersionInfo, rather than
      synthesizing the release-notes URL itself based on the viewer version string.
      15418f99
    • Nat Goodspeed's avatar
      SL-11216: Convert LLVersionInfo to an LLSingleton. · 5a260e0c
      Nat Goodspeed authored
      This changeset is meant to exemplify how to convert a "namespace" class whose
      methods are static -- and whose data are module-static -- to an LLSingleton.
      LLVersionInfo has no initClass() or cleanupClass() methods, but the general
      idea is the same.
      
      * Derive the class from LLSingleton<T>:
        class LLSomeSingleton: public LLSingleton<LLSomeSingleton> { ... };
      * Add LLSINGLETON(LLSomeSingleton); in the private section of the class. This
        usage implies a separate LLSomeSingleton::LLSomeSingleton() definition, as
        described in indra/llcommon/llsingleton.h.
      * Move module-scope data in the .cpp file to non-static class members. Change
        any sVariableName to mVariableName to avoid being outright misleading.
      * Make static class methods non-static. Remove '//static' comments from method
        definitions as needed.
      * For LLVersionInfo specifically, the 'const std::string&' return type was
        replaced with 'std::string'. Returning a reference to a static or a member,
        const or otherwise, is an anti-pattern: the interface constrains the
        implementation, prohibiting possibly later returning a temporary (an
        expression).
      * For LLVersionInfo specifically, 'const S32' return type was replaced with
        simple 'S32'. 'const' is just noise in that usage.
      * Simple member initialization (e.g. the original initializer expressions for
        static variables) can be done with member{ value } initializers (no examples
        here though).
      * Delete initClass() method.
      * LLSingleton's forté is of course lazy initialization. It might work to
        simply delete any calls to initClass(). But if there are side effects that
        must happen at that moment, replace LLSomeSingleton::initClass() with
        (void)LLSomeSingleton::instance();
      * Most initClass() initialization can be done in the constructor, as would
        normally be the case.
      * Initialization that might cause a circular LLSingleton reference should be
        moved to initSingleton(). Override 'void initSingleton();' should be private.
      * For LLVersionInfo specifically, certain initialization that used to be
        lazily performed was made unconditional, due to its low cost.
      * For LLVersionInfo specifically, certain initialization involved calling
        methods that have become non-static. This was moved to initSingleton()
        because, in a constructor body, 'this' does not yet point to the enclosing
        class.
      * Delete cleanupClass() method.
      * There is already a generic LLSingletonBase::deleteAll() call in
        LLAppViewer::cleanup(). It might work to let this new LLSingleton be cleaned
        up with all the rest. But if there are side effects that must happen at that
        moment, replace LLSomeSingleton::cleanupClass() with
        LLSomeSingleton::deleteSingleton(). That said, much of the benefit of
        converting to LLSingleton is deleteAll()'s guarantee that cross-LLSingleton
        dependencies will be properly honored: we're trying to migrate the code base
        away from the present fragile manual cleanup sequence.
      * Most cleanupClass() cleanup can be done in the destructor, as would normally
        be the case.
      * Cleanup that might throw an exception should be moved to cleanupSingleton().
        Override 'void cleanupSingleton();' should be private.
      * Within LLSomeSingleton methods, remove any existing
        LLSomeSingleton::methodName() qualification: simple methodName() is better.
      * In the rest of the code base, convert most LLSomeSingleton::methodName()
        references to LLSomeSingleton::instance().methodName(). (Prefer instance() to
        getInstance() because a reference does not admit the possibility of NULL.)
      * Of course, LLSomeSingleton::ENUM_VALUE can remain unchanged.
      
      In general, for many successive references to an LLSingleton instance, it
      can be useful to capture the instance() as in:
      
      auto& versionInfo{LLVersionInfo::instance()};
      // ... versionInfo.getVersion() ...
      
      We did not do that here only to simplify the code review.
      
      The STRINGIZE(expression) macro encapsulates:
      std::ostringstream out;
      out << expression;
      return out.str();
      We used that in a couple places.
      
      For LLVersionInfo specifically, lllogininstance_test.cpp used to dummy out a
      couple specific static methods. It's harder to dummy out
      LLSingleton::instance() references, so we add the real class to that test.
      5a260e0c
Loading